|
International Partnerships Among Museums
History of the Program
|
The International Partnerships Among Museums (IPAM) program began in
1980 to provide U.S. and non-U.S. museums with a unique opportunity to
establish lasting institutional ties through project-based exchanges.
An earlier program, the Foreign Museum Professionals Project, administered
by the American Association of Museums, was the precursor to the current
IPAM program. From 1973 to 1977, this program was funded by the U.S. Department
of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. An additional session
took place in 1979, this time under the auspices of the U.S. International
Communication Agency (ICA), for a period of four years the name given
the U.S. Information Agency (USIA). Each cycle of this program sponsored
a group of approximately 20 international museum professionals to travel
together throughout the U.S. for a one-month period, visiting museums
and meeting American colleagues. This brief exposure to many types of
institutions and their staffs was designed to provide the visitors with
an introduction to American museums and their methods of working.
Many of the visitors and their American counterparts, however, expressed
an interest in a program that would make available the opportunity for
substantive exchange and the time to learn more about the institutions
and the people who staff them.
In 1980, in response to this need, AAM designed a pilot project to encourage
integration and collaboration between museums in the U.S. and their counterparts
in other countries. This program was funded by the National Museum Act
of the Smithsonian Institution. This new program stressed institutional
involvement, in-depth experience of another country for both participants,
and reciprocity, thus differing from the International Visitor Programs
of the United States Information Agency and AAM's previous international
program. This program also differed from previous USIA programs because
the participants and their institutions were chosen competitively. U.S.
and non-U.S. museums applied separately to the AAM office and were selected
and matched by a selection committee. This process continued with little
change until the 1991-93 IPAM cycle.
During an evaluation of the program, conducted in the summer of 1990,
successful partnerships were defined as those that exhibited a continued
link subsequent to the actual exchange period. More importantly, it was
noted that the most successful partnerships were those based on a pre-determined
project, undertaken by institutions with a similar mission, and carried
out by comparably positioned staff members. In addition, exchanges tended
to produce more substantive results and to continue after the initial
travel had taken place if participants had the opportunity to choose their
own museum partners (the pairing had previously been carried out by the
selection committee).
Consequently, the application process was restructured so museums could
link themselves while addressing these criteria. As a result, a two-phase
application process was developed. In Phase I, U.S. institutions submit
short applications to AAM detailing their mission, collections, and some
possible IPAM project ideas. Non-U.S. Phase I applicants are nominated
by participating U.S. embassy/consulate officers, and submit a similar
application. Upon receipt of both sets of applications, AAM compiles them
into books and, along with instructions for Phase II, sends all the non-U.S.
Phase I applications to all the U.S. Phase I museums and all the U.S.
Phase I museum applications to all the participating U.S. embassies/consulates
to share with their nominees.
During Phase II, U.S. museums take the lead in contacting possible partner
institutions in other countries. Once museums determine that they would
both benefit through an IPAM partnership, they work together to develop
a joint or complementary project proposal for submission with their Phase
II final application. During this process, U.S. embassy/consulate officers
help with communications, interpretation, and the adherence to deadlines.
This revised system, which allows for self-matching, requires that U.S.
embassies/consulates be more integrally involved in the IPAM application
process. The U.S. embassy/consulate officers for IPAM complete a section
of their nominees' Phase I application form that asks for detailed communications
information. This allowed U.S. museums to easily contact potential partners
all over the world. In Phase II, officers submit a statement with each
completed application. This statement identifies the place and importance
of the applicant institution in the host country society, articulates
the museum's mission and goals, and discusses the importance of the proposed
linkage to bilateral relations between the United States and the host
country. The input and participation of the U.S. embassies/consulates
at the application stage of the competition also results in a smoother
running of the actual exchanges.
In October of 1999, USIA was absorbed into the U.S. Department of State.
The Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs retained its public diplomacy mission, and the
IPAM program continued to receive support.
Since 1984, the IPAM program has also benefited from the receipt of funding
from private sector sources. These funds have been earmarked for partnerships
in parts of the world or on topics in which the funder has an interest.
Private-sector funders who have supported the IPAM program include the:
AT&T Foundation;
Florence Gould Foundation; J.
Paul Getty Grant Program; Lampadia Foundation; Netherlands-American
Amity Trust; Rockefeller
Foundation; Samuel
H. Kress Foundation; and the Trust
for Mutual Understanding.
Back
to IPAM
Contact
IPAM Staff
|